Ethics and Justice in Criminal Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Ethics and Justice in Criminal impartiality - Essay ExampleShantel should ethically not plead guilty to a crime she did not bear down (Siegel & Worrall, 2011). This is however difficult given her past records of criminal abominations. In addition, her evidence may not be considered strong enough given she was staying together with a boyfriend who was a drug addict. Shantel is not the lone(prenominal) one with such scenarios fact bargaining, sentence bargaining and charge bargaining are also ordinarily used. For example, an individual who has been unrightfully charged for first degree murder may plead that the case be cut to a man slaughter against the backdrop of the reigning laws and rules. Plea bargaining has been challenged for its using the game surmise to analyze and decide on a plea bargaining process (Siegel & Worrall, 2011). In addition, crime victims do not have the ability to influence plea agreements. Defense Attorneys and the Ethics of Death Row Volunteering This p resents twain legal and ethical dilemmas in that I, as the defense attorney, am charged with protecting the clients interests and negotiating between my own personal values and the clients wishes as pertains to the execution. This hence needs a balance between my personal values and professional standing. ... This in mentioning would mean revisiting past cases that turned fall out well. If metalworker accepts other appeal, I could raise an appeal on the intensity of the punishment that has been raised against Smith and review the past evidences at length. Capital punishment is a great human rights violation since everyone has a right to life. Secondly, retribution results in massive killings of each other since it applies the eye for eye rule and at last the comparativeity of capital punishment has raised legal issues. In most cases, the punishment is not proportional to the offense that has been committed and hence needs a thorough evaluation of the intensity of the wrong that has been committed. I would hence appeal that if Smith be given a sentence, then it should be proportional to the offense that Smith has committed. Justice for All Justice ought to apply to all American citizens irrespective of age, social berth and race. Marriott is already under probation for misbehavior and has a curfew of 11p.m. She has not finished the period yet has been found with another mistake which is even grosser drunken driving past the curfews on the probation order. As the appellate judge, on the reason of the law, Marriott should serve her jail term. The final decision on Marriotts case lies with the courts and not with the sheriffs. It is hence illegal for the Sherriff to lift charges that have been placed on a citizen unless she/he challenges the verdict through a lawyer. Marriotts due process rights have not been infringed into, because the law is clear on actions that are taken against individuals who intentionally break the law even after being served with a probation order.